<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I pretty much hear everyone saying the same thing here so folks
don’t need to get too riled up. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>People need to be aware that riding a bike on the sidewalk
creates a hazard for others. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Of course we have a Jay walking law and I believe those smaller
scooters actually are classified the same as bikes.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
missoulagov-bounces@cmslists.com [mailto:missoulagov-bounces@cmslists.com] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Everest Designs<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> missoulagov@cmslists.com<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [MissoulaGov] Bikes on Sidewalks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
<td valign=top style='padding:0in 0in 0in 0in'>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Ok then we should allow all the cool progressive people
who buy small scooters from scooterville to ride on the sidewalks too----yeah
let's just ride r bikes any way we want with out any rules like----ya know
like J walking which really isn't a problem but somehow I bet there is
legislation in place at the city level. Just
walk your bike---whats the big deal.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Matt<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div id=RTEContent>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><em><span style='color:#0000BF'> </span></em><span
style='color:#0000BF'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><br>
<br>
--- On <b>Wed, 10/7/09, missoulagov-request@cmslists.com <i><missoulagov-request@cmslists.com></i></b>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>
From: missoulagov-request@cmslists.com
<missoulagov-request@cmslists.com><br>
Subject: MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7<br>
To: missoulagov@cmslists.com<br>
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 12:00 PM<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Send MissoulaGov mailing list submissions to<br>
<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov@cmslists.com">missoulagov@cmslists.com</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a
href="http://www.cmslists.com/mailman/listinfo/missoulagov" target="_blank">http://www.cmslists.com/mailman/listinfo/missoulagov</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov-request@cmslists.com">missoulagov-request@cmslists.com</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov-owner@cmslists.com">missoulagov-owner@cmslists.com</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of MissoulaGov digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks (amy
casamassa)<br>
2. Re: Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks (Ethel
MacDonald)<br>
3. Re: Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks (David
V. Gray)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:29:51 -0600<br>
From: amy casamassa <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=amytcas@gmail.com">amytcas@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks<br>
To: <a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov@cmslists.com">missoulagov@cmslists.com</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=2f9b529f0910061229v69873d67pdb9a3149a6351c2c@mail.gmail.com">2f9b529f0910061229v69873d67pdb9a3149a6351c2c@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"<br>
<br>
I completely agree with the statement below from <a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kjerrim@missoula.com">kjerrim@missoula.com</a>.
In<br>
addition, I think trying to paint cyclists as toddler-smashing,<br>
downtown-ruining, menaces to society is just plain silly. Accidents do<br>
happen due to people not paying attention, not knowing the rules, or just<br>
plain not caring about others, but for the most part we live in a pretty<br>
tolerant place. I consider myself progressive, but I think a silly road to<br>
go down is believing that legislating tolerance and courteousness will<br>
really stop intolerance or discourteousness.<br>
<br>
<br>
I appreciate what the BID is attempting to do for bikes from Broadway to the<br>
X's, but these ordinances that pertain to behavior have got to stop.
Bums<br>
and bikes are not the reason why downtowns are failing. Are we really<br>
pretending that there is any truth to that? You could strategically
place<br>
proximity mines in front of Super Walmart and people would still fight to<br>
get in there. We all know that a large reason downtowns are failing<br>
isbecause it costs considerably more to buy something from asmalllocal<br>
business than it does to buy it from a box store. Despite the fact that
I<br>
know that, I make a conscious effort to buy locally. There are many
reasons<br>
why, not the least of which being that I love this town and the character<br>
that comes with it. I find that the things I buy may cost more
downtown,<br>
but are more special (and let?s face it, less toxic) than things I can find<br>
in a box store. Last year all the gifts I bought for Christmas came
from<br>
stores downtown or south of the bridge on Higgins. I am willing to
spend<br>
more to keep businesses alive in Missoula. I feel like Missoula isn?t
an<br>
over-regulated place and I think that means we trust our citizenry to make<br>
choices with the community in mind. I understand that the BID and City<br>
Council are working towards making downtown a desirable and convenient place<br>
to shop, but I don?t think the way to do that is to make downtown Missoula a<br>
whitewashed, cutsey-bootsie, over-regulated, Park City-esque mountain town.<br>
Which is what I see happening with these laws to stop people from doing<br>
things that a portion of the population finds annoying. Not<br>
dangerous-annoying. If that is the case, then those downtown businesses
can<br>
kiss my dollars goodbye.<br>
<br>
Amy T. Cas<br>
<br>
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM, <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kjerrim@missoula.com">kjerrim@missoula.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
I think the whole point I am hearing raised is enough with all these<br>
ordinances pertaining to behavioral problems that some find annoying but<br>
others may not.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a
href="http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091006/36edd10b/attachment.html"
target="_blank">http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091006/36edd10b/attachment.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:40:20 -0600<br>
From: Ethel MacDonald <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ethelmacd@gmail.com">ethelmacd@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks<br>
To: Pam Walzer <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pamwalzer@gmail.com">pamwalzer@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov@cmslists.com">missoulagov@cmslists.com</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=49c658a60910061240q56f2781arb5136131ce48a667@mail.gmail.com">49c658a60910061240q56f2781arb5136131ce48a667@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Well-said, Pam! Remind me to send you $$ when you have to go through
the<br>
re-election hassle. We need people like you on CC who see more than one<br>
side of things and try to work together in peace (and fortunately, most CC<br>
members do, in my opinion.) Ethel<br>
<br>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Pam Walzer <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pamwalzer@gmail.com">pamwalzer@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> Thank you all for this discussion - and those past. I rarely chime in,<br>
> rather I prefer listen to what this participating community is saying.
Much<br>
> has been said in this conversation that I finally would like to add to
or<br>
> clarify.<br>
><br>
> To put into perspective how much the City of Missoula collects in taxes
on<br>
> residential properties, and therefore what a "large tax break"
that Jeremy<br>
> Hood suggested would look like, I took a gander at my last year's
property<br>
> tax bill. I have a modest home in the Westside. Probably overpriced due
to<br>
> its location and very grateful to have purchased it when it was truly<br>
> affordable. I'm guessing it's tue, open market value is now on the high
end<br>
> of today's "affordable" to low side of median price for
Missoula.<br>
><br>
> For all that the City of Missoula provides me: fire, police, streets -
with<br>
> or without potholes, traffic lights, snow and leaf removal, parks, open<br>
> space protection, zoning protection to make sure a tire manufacturer
doesn't<br>
> open up next door to me, on and on .... I paid $403.08 last year in
*CITY*taxes, or $33.59 per month. That's less than my satellite TV bill! I
also<br>
> gladly paid an additional $71.25 per year in a permenant SID to pay for<br>
> extra neighborhood street and alley lighting - although much of that
goes to<br>
> Northwestern to rent the light poles. So for less than $40/month in
taxes to<br>
> the City of Missoula, I get all the services, tangible and intangible,
that<br>
> the city provides to its citizens, businesses and visitors (who, by the<br>
> way, pay NO direct taxes to the city).<br>
><br>
> To follow one of Jeremy's ideas (which is similar to many others about
the<br>
> value of tax breaks) - let's give owners of rental properties a break in<br>
> their city taxes so they can pass it off in lower rentals.
Reducing the<br>
> rent on property like mine $40/month is not going to make it any more<br>
> affordable to rent (or even own). In the mean time, the city would no
longer<br>
> have all of those small, individual revenues to provide for those myriad
of<br>
> services we all need or want. If we, as a community, want all of those<br>
> things that the city provides, then who is going to pay? Increase the
taxes<br>
> on owner occupied homes? Increase the property taxes on businesses? As
much<br>
> as I want to do what I can support local business, I'm pretty sure the<br>
> courts would find it a constitutional problem with the city taxing Home<br>
> Depot more than Boyce Lumber, or REI or more than Trailhead. If you want
to<br>
> support local, than do just that - spend your dollars at Quality Supply,<br>
> Orange St. Food Farm, downtown stores, etc... We are fortunate that we
do<br>
> have numerous high quality and reasonably priced local and Montana based<br>
> businesses to choose from.<br>
><br>
> So how can the city solve some of the problems like real or perceived<br>
> blight on Brooks corridor or West Broadway or Russell St.? As Geoff
Badenoch<br>
> said, the city has the MRA to encourage and assist in the redevelopement
of<br>
> areas like these around the city. But private business has to be willing
and<br>
> feel that a profit can be made. Last night we passed the zoning
ordinance<br>
> rewrite. A small part of that document provides zoning tools that will
make<br>
> it easier for developers to do mixed use development. During the West<br>
> Broadway charette process, the consultants said that there was a
significant<br>
> impediment to reaching the vision that the community saw for the area -
we<br>
> did not have zoning that would allow the implementation of that vision.<br>
> Now we have that. Will West Broadway suddenly become the vision, with
tree<br>
> lined streets with landscaped medians and lots of pedestrians and small<br>
> shops with apartments above with everyone smiling and happy and well<br>
> dressed? No, it will be a long evolutionary process, one that requires
the<br>
> business community and the city government to continue to work together.
The<br>
> city can't do it alone, but we can help the process. By having a plan
and<br>
> providing tools with zoning and the MRA, we are helping the process
along.<br>
><br>
> So what can the city do to improve the economy in Missoula? Besides what<br>
> Geoff B. and Jim McGraff have already listed that we actually do, I
believe<br>
> we keep on doing what we do so well - keep Missoula a wonderful place to<br>
> live and do business. That means worrying about the minutia of daily
living:<br>
> dogs at large, bears in dumpsters, cars speeding in neighborhoods, bikes<br>
> "speeding" on sidewalks, cars not providing bikes a safe share
of the<br>
> road, bikes stopping or not at stop signs, people driving while
distracted<br>
> by cell phones, boulevard tree maintenance. Some people find these
things a<br>
> threat to their safety and well-being, others feel that they have a
right<br>
> to act how they personally feel is safe and/or appropriate, others feel
that<br>
> these are silly common sense or manners things and that the city should
stay<br>
> out of it. What a wonderful society we would be it we ALL lived by the<br>
> golden rule. Very few, if any, laws would be necessary. But look into
your<br>
> hearts and your actions, the actions of your neighbors, and "that
idiot down<br>
> the street" and realize that essentially all we do on council is to
try to<br>
> protect your and your neighbor's quality of life in the City of
Missoula.<br>
> There is at least one thing, probably many, that the city regulates (or<br>
> doesn't!) that you feel is absolutely necessary. Likewise, I'm sure
there is<br>
> at least one thing, probably many, that you think is a complete waste of<br>
> time and energy - but that just happens to be something that someone
else<br>
> feels is extremely important for them. So the city council spends a lot
of<br>
> time deciding how we, with very limited resources, can keep Missoula a<br>
> wonderful place to live and work while it grows and evolves over the
years.<br>
><br>
> Thank you for your patience in my ruminating. It's obvious why I rarely<br>
> participate.<br>
><br>
> Pam Walzer,<br>
> Missoula City Council<br>
> Alderwoman, Ward 2<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> -----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------<br>
><br>
> Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But<br>
> posts to this list may be entered into the public record.<br>
> Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org<br>
> List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com<<a
href="http://www.cedarmountainsoftware.com/" target="_blank">http://www.cedarmountainsoftware.com/</a>>.<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
"Apathy is a vice." Oscar Wilde<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a
href="http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091006/244130d5/attachment-0001.htm"
target="_blank">http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091006/244130d5/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:31:39 -0600<br>
From: "David V. Gray" <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hdgray@modwest.com">hdgray@modwest.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks<br>
To: "'amy casamassa'" <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=amytcas@gmail.com">amytcas@gmail.com</a>>,
<<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov@cmslists.com">missoulagov@cmslists.com</a>><br>
Message-ID: <010701ca46ed$eb3ac050$c1b040f0$@com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
God this is the such a beautiful email. Way to go Amy.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
David V. Gray<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: <a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov-bounces@cmslists.com">missoulagov-bounces@cmslists.com</a><br>
[mailto:<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov-bounces@cmslists.com">missoulagov-bounces@cmslists.com</a>]
On Behalf Of amy casamassa<br>
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:30 PM<br>
To: <a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=missoulagov@cmslists.com">missoulagov@cmslists.com</a><br>
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Committee Update 9-30-09 Bikes on Sidewalks<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I completely agree with the statement below from <a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kjerrim@missoula.com">kjerrim@missoula.com</a>.
In<br>
addition, I think trying to paint cyclists as toddler-smashing,<br>
downtown-ruining, menaces to society is just plain silly. Accidents do<br>
happen due to people not paying attention, not knowing the rules, or just<br>
plain not caring about others, but for the most part we live in a pretty<br>
tolerant place. I consider myself progressive, but I think a silly road to<br>
go down is believing that legislating tolerance and courteousness will<br>
really stop intolerance or discourteousness. <br>
<br>
<br>
I appreciate what the BID is attempting to do for bikes from Broadway to the<br>
X's, but these ordinances that pertain to behavior have got to stop.
Bums<br>
and bikes are not the reason why downtowns are failing. Are we really<br>
pretending that there is any truth to that? You could strategically
place<br>
proximity mines in front of Super Walmart and people would still fight to<br>
get in there. We all know that a large reason downtowns are failing is<br>
because it costs considerably more to buy something from a small local<br>
business than it does to buy it from a box store. Despite the fact that
I<br>
know that, I make a conscious effort to buy locally. There are many
reasons<br>
why, not the least of which being that I love this town and the character<br>
that comes with it. I find that the things I buy may cost more
downtown,<br>
but are more special (and let's face it, less toxic) than things I can find<br>
in a box store. Last year all the gifts I bought for Christmas came
from<br>
stores downtown or south of the bridge on Higgins. I am willing to
spend<br>
more to keep businesses alive in Missoula. I feel like Missoula isn't
an<br>
over-regulated place and I think that means we trust our citizenry to make<br>
choices with the community in mind. I understand that the BID and City<br>
Council are working towards making downtown a desirable and convenient place<br>
to shop, but I don't think the way to do that is to make downtown Missoula a<br>
whitewashed, cutsey-bootsie, over-regulated, Park City-esque mountain town.<br>
Which is what I see happening with these laws to stop people from doing<br>
things that a portion of the population finds annoying. Not<br>
dangerous-annoying. If that is the case, then those downtown businesses
can<br>
kiss my dollars goodbye. <br>
<br>
Amy T. Cas<br>
<br>
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM, <<a
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kjerrim@missoula.com">kjerrim@missoula.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
I think the whole point I am hearing raised is enough with all these<br>
ordinances pertaining to behavioral problems that some find annoying but<br>
others may not.<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a
href="http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091006/abfdfacb/attachment-0001.htm"
target="_blank">http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091006/abfdfacb/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-------Please delete extra content when replying to messages--------<br>
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But posts
to this list may be entered into the public record.<br>
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org<br>
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com. <br>
<br>
End of MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7<br>
******************************************<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" color="#000080">Messages and attachments sent to or from this e-mail
account pertaining to City business may be considered public or private records
depending on the message content. The City is often required by law to provide
public records to individuals requesting them. The City is also required by law
to protect private, confidential information. This message is intended for the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this transmission, please notify the sender immediately, do not
forward the message to anyone, and delete all copies. Thank you</font></p>
</body>
</html>