BJaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us
Tue Mar 29 13:19:09 MDT 2011
The mandate is to remove everything over 4". The work will take place while the river is still low (soon).
Missoula City Council Ward 3
1225 South 2nd West
Missoula, MT 59801
From: missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com [missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com] On Behalf Of Paul Sopko [psopko at peoplepc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:50 AM
To: Kate Jerrim Ybarra; missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] trees
I agree with Kate.
Don't cut everything down just because the offending vegetation is of the evil "non native" variety. They still provide some positive benefits and cutting it down in one fell swoop, will leave a visual blight. Lets not forget, we live in an urban area where non native flaura and fauna dominate.
One of the prior posts claims that "if you plant a non-native tree, nothing eats it. Nothing". I've haven't seen anything in the literature that's made such a bold claim. Ecosystems, even urban ecosystems are much more complex .
>From: Kate Jerrim Ybarra <kjerrim at missoula.com>
>Sent: Mar 29, 2011 10:22 AM
>To: missoulagov at cmslists.com
>Subject: [MissoulaGov] trees
>Regarding the discussion of the levee and being in compliance with the
>army corps of engineers. The over grown trees along the river bank
>have been an issue for years now and as Geoff Badenoch pointed out on
>this list serve, it wasn?t addressed many years ago by Howard Toole
>because he didn?t want to be perceived as the city official who clear
>cut the river front. Given the longevity of this problem, I am not
>sure why this is so pressing now. Are we being fined or something?
>I will admit here I haven?t read all this too closely so if I am
>speaking out of school, I apologize. But I surely hope that an
>inventory of some kind will take place and that not all these
>offending trees will be taken down in one fell swoop. Wouldn?t it
>make more sense to go about this over a period of time cutting a few
>trees that are larger than 4 inches each spring? This would be much
>less dramatic. I don?t think folks fully glean what this will look
>like aesthetically. Also even if they are not native trees they do
>promote some good. See:
>I sure hope that Able Tree service isn?t starting this project April 2nd?..
>-----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
>Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
>Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
>List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
A better way to Internet
-----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
Messages and attachments sent to or from this e-mail account pertaining to City business may be considered public or private records depending on the message content. The City is often required by law to provide public records to individuals requesting them. The City is also required by law to protect private, confidential information. This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please notify the sender immediately, do not forward the message to anyone, and delete all copies. Thank you
More information about the MissoulaGov