[MissoulaGov] Dave's proposal is to make it a criminal offense to refuse the test punishable with a $300 fine

[Ruth Link]

So will the $300?

 

 

Ruth A. Link

Public Affairs Director, MOR

 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

From: Ethel MacDonald [mailto:ethelmacd at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:21 PM
To: Ruth Link
Cc: Carole; missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Dave's proposal is to make it a criminal offense
to refuse the test punishable with a $300 fine

 

I agree -- losing the license should be a worse punishment -- except that it
appears that not having a license doesn't keep our repeat offenders off the
road.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Ruth Link <rlink at missoularealestate.com>
wrote:

Just a quick question..

 

With regards to Dave's proposal, I'm trying to remember back to my days in
Driver's Education.  I recall being told that as a condition of having a
license I'm give consent to be tested for intoxication if required.  If I
refuse, than I forfeit the right to have a license for 6 months.  Is that
correct?

 

If so, I think the $300 is by far a lesser punishment than having to get by
without a license for 6 months!  Just a little food for thought.

 

 

Ruth A. Link

 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4881 (20100219) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




-- 
"Be still, and the world is bound to turn herself inside out to entertain
you.  Everywhere you look, joyful noise is clanging to drown out quiet
desperation" -- Barbara Kingsolver

 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4881 (20100219) __________

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20100219/2f41ec72/attachment.htm>