[MissoulaGov] Committee Update 9-30-09
Jeremy Hood
thepoe at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 3 20:19:08 MDT 2009
Thank you for the realistic unoffensive take.
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:45:25 -0600
> From: kjerrim at missoula.com
> To: missoulagov at cmslists.com
> Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Committee Update 9-30-09
>
> As usual no news is good news if you are marginalized low income and
> possibly exeriencing homelessness. Between the newspaper article last
> week and comments here and else where I don't see a whole lot of
> community building going on. All this lumping together of different
> populations of people and different problems is always unfortunate.
> Individuals who are experiencing homelessness, chronic alcoholics and
> counter culture kids passing through town cannot be held responsible
> for the "ruin" of downtown. That seems like a real stretch to me. And
> as mentioned in Bobs original update, lets all quit saying how awful
> it is downtown because thats certainly not good for business
> regardless of ones experience there.
>
> It is clear that a number of downtown business owners are experiencing
> problems with behavior some of which is illegal and that the behavior
> does need to be addressed. I believe their are also many downtown
> business owners who are not having problems with behavior. Likely it
> depends on your location. One thing I have found in life is that its
> very hard to curb bad behavior in other people be they children,
> friends or strangers. It is not however difficult to mitigate illegal
> behavior. As I have mentioned several times in the course of the last
> several months we have a law- the states disorderly conduct law- that
> could be used to address most of what is plaguing business owners and
> those who find downtown to be a "gauntlet." But that means you have to
> call the police and report the behavior. Not call a downtown
> ambassador. I am perplexed by that whole phenomena. Why are people
> calling BID about this. Is BID an arm of the police? Further, why are
> the proposal of these ordinances-panhandling and ped interference
> relying on stats from BID? I want to see the raw data from the
> police. How many unduplicated complaints about how many unduplicated
> individuals were received. Was the states disorderly conduct law used
> to deal with it. If not why. Jim Nugent wrote a very extensive opinion
> on the disorderly conduct law and how it might be used. Its on the
> citys website for anyone interested. Now that the Panhandling
> ordinance is passed, data should be collected and culled so that as we
> move forward we can evaluate if that ordinance effects any relief for
> the businesses experiencing problems.
>
> Another thing I have learned in life is that we all find different
> things irritating and in this regard one cannot ordinance their way
> out of not irritating someone. Both ordinances will be ineffective in
> curbing the actions of individuals who are downtown passed out on the
> side walk or sleeping on the side walk who are chronic alcoholics. It
> would be more cost effective to house these individuals using a
> transitional housing voucher until they can get a federally funded
> shelter plus care voucher. Alcoholism is a disease. The current real
> change monies could be used to do this or the city could put forth
> some money. As for those kids passing through each year on their
> Hunter Thompson voyage who want to be seen and perceived as counter
> culture, whats the problem? They have a right to hang out on the side
> walk as long as they are not doing something illegal. Just because
> some find it offensive is mute. If they are doing something illegal or
> harrassing call the police. Otherwise live and let live. This is
> present in all major metropolitan citys and it doesnt dissuade me from
> walking down 1st ave in seattle. I do not feel that current direction
> of some of the changes downtown is in keeping with the Missoula that
> people come to visit. People come from around the world to see James
> Crumley's Missoula- to experience Charlies, to see the Lee Nye
> "Missoulacana". To be in an eclectic environment. Trying to make
> Missoula the next Vail or park city is not going to be productive in
> the long run. Were a college town and haven of free thinkers. Having
> all this flap going on introduces an atmosphere that it neither
> conducive to the sense of community nor reflective of Missoula's
> unique, eclectic attributes. Lets move on and use the laws we have to
> curb illegal behavior.
>
> Incidently, from a historical perspective I find it interesting that
> this "problem" with "vagrancy" hasn't changed much since the late
> 1880s. One city council members conclusion at the city council meeting
> that passed the panhandling ordinance(I'll paraphrase here) that the
> ordinance wasnt just about aggressive panhandling but about people not
> wanting to see it while they shop really opitimizes the primary intent
> of the ordinances. This isn't much different then the intent of the
> original Poor Farm that was created by the city and operated between
> 1886 and 1936 on the site of the current Pine View Park and
> Rattlesnake school. Historical documents indicate that the Poor Farm
> was created because vagrancy wasn't good for business. So all this is
> nothing new. But we could use a new approach. Let’s go back to the
> drawing board on this one and collect some data and look at long term
> solutions that will creatively address problems downtown, rather than
> voting in a ineffective ordinance that could possibly set a tone that
> is not part of the traditional inclusive spirit of Missoula. Kate
> Jerrim Ybarra
> _______________________________________________
> -----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
>
> Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
> Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
> List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20091003/cf363ef9/attachment.htm>
More information about the MissoulaGov
mailing list