[MissoulaGov] MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5
Nick Kaufman
NKaufman at wgmgroup.com
Mon May 11 10:11:18 MDT 2009
A good exercise is to use Googleearth and browse the image of the aerial
view of downtown. You may be suprised to see all the surface parking
that exists in the downtown. All these serface lots are future
opportunities for housing and businesses that create "Life on the
street" and create densities that support efficient transit etc., etc.
Nick Kaufman
Vice President , Principal Planner
WGM Group, Inc.
http://www.wgmgroup.com <http://www.wgmgroup.com/>
________________________________
From: missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com
[mailto:missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com] On Behalf Of Brent Campbell
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Ethel MacDonald
Cc: missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5
Structured parking is the natural evolution of our downtown as surface
lots are replaced with buildings and new businesses.
The parking structures are critical investments the City can make to
incentivize infill and redevelopment in downtown. The other critical
investment is in streetscaping, outdoor lighting, and improving access
and circulation. It is critical for everyone to understand this as
fundamental to the redevelopment strategy for downtown. We have made
little progress in the past 5 years. We need to restart the engine.
Brent Campbell, P.E.
President / CEO
WGM Group, Inc.
http://www.wgmgroup.com <http://www.wgmgroup.com/>
________________________________
From: Ethel MacDonald [mailto:ethelmacd at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 9:19 AM
To: Brent Campbell
Cc: missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5
While I'm trying to avoid a knee-jerk reaction to the idea of a huge
parking structure, and would like to believe Brent's statement that it
would be a "fantastic enhancement to Caras," and certainly agree with
Goeff's suggestions for modern, more efficient design, I still believe
that more parking space is not the way to improve Missoula's downtown.
Consider this: on First Friday evenings and Saturday mornings, the
downtown sidewalks are packed with people. Where do they all park? On
Saturday mornings they're biking, walking, taking the shuttle, but
still, many of them, including all the market merchants, must drive.
Friday evenings they are not taking the bus, and fewer are biking, so
where are they parking? I suggest they are parking in those spots that
downtown non-retail (office) workers use 8-5 on weekdays. I know I'm
over-simplifying, but when downtown office workers start taking the bus,
biking, or walking, more people who'd like to shop downtown will be able
to find a parking spot. I suspect more retail employers encourage
employees to take the bus to free up parking spaces for customers.
Missoula in Motion offers many incentives employers can take advantage
of. Why not give it a try?
And while it might be nice to enlarge the actual park area of Caras
Park, it does seem to me that the present parking spaces there are
needed for the Carousel, Clark fork Market, and special events, and it
would be a mistake to take any away and offering the alternative of a
parking garage that will no doubt be fairly expensive.
When both parking and gas become limited and expensive enough,
people will find better ways to get around. So while some downtown
enthusiasts might see the "build it (parking garage) and they will come
(to shop downtown instead of elsewhere)" as good reason to build, some
of us equally interested in a vibrant downtown believe the sad truth of
the statement is that whether it's a 4-lane speedway to get there or a
parking facility, when you make it easier to drive & park, fewer people
will choose more environmentally-friendly modes of travel. Biking,
walking, taking the bus, even carpooling, promote a healthy, friendly
community. Individual drivers competing for roadway and parking space
do not promote community -- until they get to their destination, of
course, when they again become our fine community members working in
their many and diverse ways to build a healthy, pleasant city. Ethel
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Brent Campbell <BCampbell at wgmgroup.com>
wrote:
The downtown plan includes removing much of the parking along
the river
near Caras park and relocating it to this structure. This will
be a
fantastic enhancement to Caras, which is in need of more space.
Additional spaces are to support Macy's staying a viable part of
downtown and strengthening our retail core along Front & Main.
I dont put much stock in the induced demand concept in urban
areas.
Peak hour spreading and driving parking and traffic into
neighborhoods
are the results of traffic congestion on our collector and
arterial
streets.
Brent Campbell, P.E.
President / CEO
WGM Group, Inc.
http://www.wgmgroup.com <http://www.wgmgroup.com/>
-----Original Message-----
From: missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com
[mailto:missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com] On Behalf Of
missoulagov-request at cmslists.com
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:00 PM
To: missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5
Send MissoulaGov mailing list submissions to
missoulagov at cmslists.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.cmslists.com/mailman/listinfo/missoulagov
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
missoulagov-request at cmslists.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
missoulagov-owner at cmslists.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific than
"Re: Contents of MissoulaGov digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. committee update 5-6-09 (Bob Jaffe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 22:27:05 -0600
From: "Bob Jaffe" <BJaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us>
Subject: [MissoulaGov] committee update 5-6-09
To: <missoulagov at cmslists.com>
Message-ID:
<689D48B33023A5469751A46A44C5A7A30D425B63 at mailserver.ci.missoula.mt.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Greetings,
This morning in Conservation we learned about an agreement the
parks
department had put together with developer Kevin Mitty regarding
the
park in the 44 ranch subdivision. Kevin wants to go ahead and
build the
improvements in the park and get reimbursed later as the city
collects
impact fees. The estimated costs for the project are just over
$1,000,000. In the end the city will only have to pay him back
around
$410,000. It's a great deal for the city. I imagine Kevin's
motivation
is that his development will be more sellable with a finished
park
instead of a weed field. 44 Ranch is a very vertical project in
that
Kevin Mitty developed the property, built all the houses, and
now is
doing the city park improvements. It's kind of like John Didell
at
Pleasantview except Kevin is working with us for parks instead
of suing
us to avoid them.
In PAZ we had the dreaded Chickasaw subdivision return. This
was the
painful project out on seventh just past Tower. We had required
a three
acre Agriculture set aside and a connecting road which required
the
whole thing to get redesigned. We approved it conditional on
staff and
the developer bringing something back to us that met all the
various
conditions we were after. They did this today and it was pretty
straight
forward. There were still a few concerns including traffic
calming for
the someday connection to the north and how storm water was
being
handled with the shallow aquifer. The Community Food and
Agriculture
Coalition didn't like the shape of the resulting agriculture
parcel so
they requested we deny the project. I get this image of the
terraced
farms cut into steep hillsides when they say killing the project
is
better than farmland that isn't a perfect rectangle. We will
finish this
one up next week.
In A&F we discussed the parking garage planned for Front and
Pattee.
There are still a lot of unknowns. It will be at least 300
spaces and
some retail along front street. If there is enough money it will
be 600
spaces. The downtown plan calls for 600 spaces so there is some
concern
of what the implications are to the rest of the analysis in the
plan if
we only build it to half size. On the other hand I have some
concerns
over the idea of induced demand. We know that if we build a road
bigger
more people will drive on it. I imagine if we make parking
easier
downtown more people will choose to drive there. That's fine if
you are
talking about customers but not so good if you are talking about
employees. I guess I would like to see us build the bigger
structure and
then allocate as much as can be used for short term parking and
charge a
lot for the leased spaces to encourage commuters to develop
other
habits.
In public works we had some disagreement over approving the
Mayor's
choice to replace Tom Wilkins with Ginny Iverson on the parking
commission board. The motion stalled on a tie and will be
forwarded to
the floor with no recommendation.
We also agreed to accept a bunch of stimulus money for the north
Higgins
street project, a project to build a whole bunch of handicap
sidewalk
ramps around town, and the sidewalk project connecting Spruce to
Greenough. Some of us were expecting a fight from the more
republican
sorts over the evils of stimulus money but no one had any
complaints
today.
In COW we heard a report from the lobbyist we hired to work the
session
for us in Helena. If you would like to see the written report it
can be
found here:
ftp://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/Packets/Council/2009/2009-05-04/Referrals/Le
gRptCOWRef.pdf
<ftp://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/Packets/Council/2009/2009-05-04/Referrals/L
egRptCOWRef.pdf>
Thanks for your interest,
Bob Jaffe
Missoula City Council, Ward 3
bjaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us <mailto:bjaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us>
406-728-1052
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20090506/5e94b
5f5/attachment.html
<http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20090506/5e94
b5f5/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
-------Please delete extra content when replying to
messages--------
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of
Missoula. But
posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org List Serve hosting
provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com
<http://www.cedarmountainsoftware.com/> .
End of MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5
******************************************
_______________________________________________
-----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of
Missoula. But posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com
<http://www.cedarmountainsoftware.com/> .
--
"We will not raise our children to kill another mother's child." Code
Pink celebrates Mother's Day 2009. http://www.womensaynotowar.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20090511/1319ccad/attachment.htm>
More information about the MissoulaGov
mailing list