[MissoulaGov] cell phones
Paradigm1 at aol.com
Paradigm1 at aol.com
Thu Mar 19 17:43:22 MDT 2009
Interesting... but i'm not sure we want our daily lives regulated by the
"Experimental Psycology" crowd. See the study below. It tells us that cell
phones increase risk by 1.3 times... and Cups in cars can increase risk by 9
times... I am wondering why we are banning the 1.3 times risk factor item, instead
of the 9 times risk factor item... anyone....?
"A study released in April 2006 found that almost 80 percent of crashes and
65 percent of near-crashes involved some form of driver inattention within
three seconds of the event. The study, The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study,
conducted by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute and the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), breaks new ground. (Earlier
research found that driver inattention was responsible for 25 to 30 percent of
crashes.) The new study found that the most common distraction is the use of
cellphones, followed by drowsiness. However, cellphone use is far less likely to
be the cause of a crash or near-miss than other distractions, according to
the study. For example, while reaching for a moving object such as a falling
cup increased the risk of a crash or near-crash by nine times, talking or
listening on a hand-held cellphone only increased the risk by 1.3 times. The study
tracked the behavior of the 241 drivers of 100 vehicles for more than one
year. The drivers were involved in 82 crashes, 761 near-crashes and 8,295
critical incidents."
In a message dated 3/19/2009 4:28:32 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
psopko at peoplepc.com writes:
Here's an abstract for another peer-reviewed paper from the Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
"Drivers talking on cell phones are more distracted and more prone to error
than if they were speaking with a friend sitting next to them in the car, a
new report finds. A recent study, published in the December 08 issue of the
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, involved 41 men and women ranging
in age from 18 to 26. Each participant was paired with a friend and asked to
navigate a 24-mile multi-lane stretch of highway with "real" highway
conditions represented on a simulator. Participants were presented with three
scenarios: driver talking on a hands-free cell phone, driver talking with a
passenger, and no conversation at all. Half of the drivers talking on cell phones
missed a designated exit, while only 3 of 24 drivers missed the exit when
talking with another person sitting next to them.
Talking with a passenger is considerably less hazardous than talking on a
cell phone.
A driver talking on a cell phone is four times more likely to get in a crash
than a driver who is not. The risks of talking on hands-free cell phones are
the same as those talking on hand-held cell phones. More information is
available at _http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=621873_
(http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=621873) . "
----- Original Message -----
From: _Jim Sayer_ (mailto:sayermon at yahoo.com)
To: _echilders at ci.missoula.mt.us_ (mailto:echilders at ci.missoula.mt.us) ;
_BJaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us_ (mailto:BJaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us) ;
_Paradigm1 at aol.com_ (mailto:Paradigm1 at aol.com)
Cc: _missoulagov at cmslists.com_ (mailto:missoulagov at cmslists.com)
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:01 AM
Subject: [MissoulaGov] cell phones
FYI, I've seen a lot of comments and speculation about the cellphone ban but
not as much hard information. Here's a list of data from this website --
_http://www.nationwide.com/newsroom/dwd-facts-figures.jsp_
(http://www.nationwide.com/newsroom/dwd-facts-figures.jsp) :
* Distraction from cell phone use while driving (hand held or hands
free) extends a driver's reaction as much as having a blood alcohol
concentration at the legal limit of .08%. (University of Utah)
* The No.1 source of driver inattention is use of a wireless device.
(Virginia Tech /NHTSA)
* Drivers that use cell phones are four times as likely to get into
crashes serious enough to injure themselves. (NHTSA, Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety)
* 10% of drivers aged 16 to 24 years old are on their phone at any one
time.
* Driving while distracted is a factor in 25% of police reported
crashes.
* Driving while using a cell phone reduces the amount of brain
activity associated with driving by 37%. (Carnegie Mellon)
Also, here's a short news summary from cnet on a study from the University
of Utah comparing driving with a cell phone and driving drunk:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6090342-7.html
BTW, there's also a story in today's Independent on Dave Strohmaier and the
local debate:
http://www.missoulanews.com/index.cfm?do=article.details&id=1B1A1542-14D1-1357-9CA97A6558961B35
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Paradigm1 at aol.com <Paradigm1 at aol.com> wrote:
From: Paradigm1 at aol.com <Paradigm1 at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Committee Update 3-18-09
To: echilders at ci.missoula.mt.us, BJaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us
Cc: missoulagov at cmslists.com
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 9:52 AM
Hi Bob... These updates are great-- thank you very much!
It will be interesting to learn how talking on a CB or Two way Radio while
driving, is less dangerous than talking on a phone ?
Carl P.
In a message dated 3/19/2009 9:39:22 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
echilders at ci.missoula.mt.us writes:
Thanks, Bob. Wonderful job. As I mentioned on the Council floor, I wish John
H. would do one.
The leash conversation is likely to be spirited. Judging from public
comments and from my previous experience, we'll also discuss dogs in-town. And
probably leashing cats, before we're done. :)
Ed Childers, City Council, Ward6
Bob Jaffe wrote:
Greetings,
We changed things up today and started with Public Works this morning. We
discussed the situation with the right of way vacations on Miller Creek road.
Here is a very brief synopsis for folks who are unfamiliar.
We are doing a project to rebuild the intersection between upper and lower
miller creek on down to the Walmart. The project requires some right of way
acquisition. During the process of researching the right of way boundaries it
was discovered that over 100 years ago additional right of way was
established that no one was aware of. This additional right of way expanded the
public property right through some of the homes on the west side of miller creek
road. It goes without saying that the folks affected were not so happy. What
was a negotiation to sell us right of way turned into a negotiation to ask us
to vacate right of way. The City was not to hot on the idea of vacating
right of way that we would have to buy back later the next time the road needed
to expand.
So the engineering folks drafted up what the anticipated future needs would
be and we will vacate the balance.
In Conservation we had interviews and made appointments to the greenhouse
gas committee. We had four applicants for one position. We picked one but were
so impressed with the other applicants that we want to talk to the committee
about expanding their membership so we can also appoint the others. Recently
this committee has become much more active and is actually taking on work
projects. It seems wrong to turn down such qualified people who want to
volunteer.
In PAZ we did six interviews for three spots on the historic preservation
committee. For the first time since I have been chair of the committee we have
an open PAZ schedule. We may actually skip PAZ for a few weeks until the
zoning update stuff makes it through planning board. I assume this is
indicative of the building slowdown.
In Public Safety we discussed the driving with cell phone ordinance. CB and
two way radios have been removed from the proposal. Discussion focused on
having different rules in Missoula from the rest of the state; Primary or
secondary offence; are the reckless driving laws already adequate. We set a
public hearing for I believe April 13th.
Then we had a joint Public Safety and Conservation meeting to discuss the
conservation land leash laws. The press was there for that one. We had TV
cameras and Missoulian photographers and a bunch of public comment. We mostly
just walked through the history of the subject from the last five or so years.
The likely outcome of all this is that there will be work done in the context
of our conservation lands management plan to establish a policy. Then we
will modify ordinance as needed to memorialize that policy. A great deal of
the public comment received to the council and in conversations I have had with
people is in regards to dogs in parks and on the commuter trails. Dogs are
required to be on leashes in these places. The current issue before council
pertains only to the north hills, mount jumbo, and the kim Williams trail east
of the university.
We finished the day with committee of the whole to discuss the revisions to
the ward boundaries and a resolution regarding transportation funding. By law
we are required to keep the wards equal to maintain equal rights of the
electors. The courts have set the bar at around 10% variance between wards.
Based on our best estimates we have a 13% variance with ward two being too large.
The best way to fix it is to shift the population clockwise around the map.
So part of ward two goes to one, part of one then goes to three, three then
to four. Five and six are about right the way they are.
So the proposal has all of the northside now part of ward one. If Mr.
Hendrickson is considering another term this is good news for him. The University
becomes part of ward three. I plan to run again so this is probably good
news for me. Unless I end up running against someone more liberal than me. I
believe I have become more conservative during my term. There is something about
this experience that pulls you towards the middle. The area southeast of
Arthur and Beckwith goes to ward four. I’ll miss Molly but probably not Philip.
The Wapikia neighborhood goes to ward five. I don’t think ward six changes.
The transportation funding resolution came out of TTAC. It outlines the
various ways we are being screwed on transportation funding by DOT and the state.
John Hendrickson, Dick, Renee, and Lynn voted against the resolution. Mr.
Hendrickson suggested that he would like to put forth a minority report
countering the request for more equitable distribution of funds to Missoula. I
look forward to seeing this minority report because I am a little baffled by the
suggestion. I encourage folks to read the resolution. We are being robbed to
support incredibly irresponsible funding priorities and bloated DOT
bureaucracy.
_ftp://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/Packets/Council/2009/2009-03-23/TransportationRes
olution.pdf_
(ftp://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/Packets/Council/2009/2009-03-23/TransportationResolution.pdf)
Thanks for your interest,
Bob Jaffe
Missoula City Council, Ward 3
_______________________________________________
-----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But
posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
____________________________________
_Great Deals on Dell 15" Laptops - Starting at $479_
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220029050x1201385914/aol?redir=http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk
;212974460;34272906;h)
_______________________________________________
-----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But posts
to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
-----Please delete extra content when replying to messages------
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But
posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
**************Great Deals on Dell 15" Laptops - Starting at $479
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220029050x1201385914/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doub
leclick.net%2Fclk%3B212974460%3B34272906%3Bh)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20090319/5001c846/attachment.htm>
More information about the MissoulaGov
mailing list