[MissoulaGov] Highlights for Monday's public hearings

Lynn Ascher lascher01 at bresnan.net
Mon Jan 12 14:08:52 MST 2009


I would like to comment on Rod Austin's statement that feral cats are
"prominent carriers of rabies." According to the U.S. Center for
Disease Control from 1981-1999 in the United States there were only
37 cases of humans having contracted rabies; 22 were from bats, 14
from dogs, and one from a skunk. Additionally, coyotes, raccoons and
foxes are also carriers.

This is corroborated by statistics posted on the website of the
Berkeley CA municipal animal shelter: "Since they are not a natural
vector for rabies, cats, including ferals, pose a very low risk for
contracting and spreading rabies. In 1998 only three cats tested
positive for rabies in all of California. There are no known cases
of a human ever contracting rabies from a cat in the state of
California."

Also I am wondering if Mr. Austin is using the term "feral cat" when
he really means free-roaming neighborhood cats who have owners and
homes, and spend time in them. Feral cats are descendants of
domestic cats whose owners abandoned them and/or did not spay or
neuter them. After several generations of living and breeding on
their own, they return to a "wild" unsocialized state, live in
colonies, and avoid humans. Controlling feral cat populations
through euthanasia programs has generally failed because the former
colonies are immediately repopulated by other abandoned, breeding
cats and thus the cycle begins all over again. Much more successful
are long term TNR (trap-neuter-return) programs wherein a colony's
feral residents are trapped, spayed or neutered and returned to their
original colony where volunteers feed and water them. They also trap
any new residents for spaying or neutering. Ultimately, with no
breeding going on, the colony dies out as its residents die. For
anyone who is interested: The Humane Society of Western Montana
sponsors a TNR feral cat program. Also HSWM and Animal Control
regularly hold low-cost spay/neuter clinics for domestic cats.

As for the very annoying habits of free-roaming neighborhood domestic
cats, I subscribe to keeping cats indoors. I have four cats who have
lived happily indoors since kittenhood. They never make a mess of my
or my neighbors' yards; they're never been attacked by predators
(including humans) or other cats, hit by cars, poisoned, trapped, got
lost, kidnapped, or stuck in somebody's basement, etc. They have not
killed any birds. And they are not neurotic because they don't go
outdoors. And, as a result of living indoors exclusively, their life
spans will be three times that of cats who go outdoors.



On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Rod Austin wrote:

I think Derek has hit the nail on the head. My sister in law is a
small animal vet north of Philly and in that area all pets are
treated the same. Leash law and all, they make no difference. There
is a responsibility to your neighbors as well as your pets. Take care
of them and keep them under your control. Is it healthy or
responsible for your cat to be attacked by dogs and other wild animals?



I have cats urinating all over my patio set, bbq, under my porch,
under my shed and in my garage when they can get in. I finally
started catching them in a live trap and taking them to the animal
shelter. Keep the fines high for any loose animal.



How do you think we will ever get a handle on the feral cat problems
we have. They are a prominent carrier of rabies. Any cat (or dog)
caught should have the requirement of being altered prior to going
back to the owner.



Believe it or not I am an animal lover. That is why when I owned a
pet I kept under my control at all times!



Thanks for the work you do!



Rod Austin



From: missoulagov-bounces at cmslists.com [mailto:missoulagov-
bounces at cmslists.com] On Behalf Of Derek Goldman
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 12:55 PM
To: bjaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us; missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] Highlights for Monday's public hearings



thanks for the heads up, Bob. Re the cat ordinance:

I'm not sure why the ammendment proposes to change the definition of
a bothersome cat from "nuisance" to "unnattended." I looked up the
dog ordinance, and bothersome DOGS are indeed referred to as
"nuisance." So why not cats? We should be consistent so as not to
send a message that dogs can be bothersome, but cats cannot be.

I would also recommend one additional change to close a loophole in
the cat ordinance:
In the definition of a nuisance/unattended cat, please strike the
last 4 words of the sentence that requires a cat to be unaltered in
order to fit the definition. If a cat is off it's owner's property,
then it may be causing problems with its neighbors irrespective of
its reproductive status.
Excessive cat breeding is indeed a problem, but it is only one
problem caused by loose cats. Urination and defecation in private and
community gardens, flower beds, compost piles, and under decks, as
well as harassment of native wildlife and other pets also present
problems. But as the ordinance is currently writen, a cat can legally
do all these things as long as it is neutered or spayed. That seems
odd (and also inconsistent with dog ordinance, which lists
"defecation..." as one of the many activities that define a nuisance
dog). Please send this back for reconsideration.
Thanks, Derek Goldman







Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:53:32 -0700
From: BJaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us
To: missoulagov at cmslists.com
Subject: [MissoulaGov] Highlights for Monday's public hearings

We have five public hearings scheduled for tomorrow.

Here are some highlights in case anyone wants to come and comment
(you can also comment by sending mail to council at ci.missoula.mt.us).



Cats:

ftp://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/Packets/Council/
2008/2008-12-15/2008CatOrdinanceAmendment%5B1%5D.pdf



There are a few changes to the ordinance being proposed.

‘Nuisance cat’ is replaced by ‘unattended cat’. An unattended cat is
an unaltered cat off of its owner’s property. To be the owner of an
unattended cat is illegal.

A breeding cat is an unaltered cat 4 months old. It used to be six
months.



It is unlawful to own a pair of unaltered cats of the opposite sex
without a breeders license.

It is unlawful to own more than five cats without a breeders license
(this appears to be the controversial one)



A breeders license costs $50 and requires an inspection.



Dogs:

Pet Day Care Centers are defined.

Leashes are required within 200 feet of trailheads.

If an unaltered dog is picked up three times in its life it gets
sterilized. There used to be an option to pay $250 to avoid
sterilization.

The following paragraph is included in the unlawful section:



For a dog owner to cause, allow, permit, either willfully or by
failure to

exercise due care, to allow a dog to be a nuisance barking dog. EXCEPT:

that such sounds made at animal shelters, commercial kennels, pet
daycare

centers and veterinary hospitals which meet the proper zoning
requirements

2. shall be exempt



The “Pet Daycare centers” were included in the exemption when it was
originally presented to us. I asked that this be removed. I am hoping
to hear from people on this prior to making a final decision. These
businesses can have a very high impact on their neighbors.



Park Fees:

General incremental increase in the parks fees. There may be some
open issues on the rate set for the 50 meter pool. There was an
expectation that it would be rented out at full cost this year but I
believe the proposal still has a general fund subsidy.



Other Public Hearings:

We also have a couple of annexations including the large Linda Vista
Estates subdivision.



Bob Jaffe

Missoula City Council, Ward 3

bjaffe at ci.missoula.mt.us

406-728-1052



Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. See how it works.

_______________________________________________
Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula.
But posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/missoulagov/attachments/20090112/fed77e0a/attachment.htm>


More information about the MissoulaGov mailing list