[MissoulaGov] MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 30, Issue 3
Nancy Wilson
nancyjw1 at hotmail.com
Sat Aug 16 21:45:19 MDT 2008
Thanks Bob. Another reason this type of investment in rental housing in urban renewal districts - particularly downtown - is one that many great places have had problems with. When the downtown - or the core of Missoula - is turned into condos instead of rentals, many of those condos are for "part time" residents. You get a lot of heated, beautiful, empty condos downtown. Let's be careful as a community and continue to work hard to keep lots of people - of all incomes - living in the core of our community.
----------------------------------------
> From: nmcdc at montana.com
> To: missoulagov at cmslists.com
> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:16:26 -0600
> Subject: Re: [MissoulaGov] MissoulaGov Digest, Vol 30, Issue 3
>
> Re: Urban Renewal
>
> Seattle was a city buffeted by condo conversions and heavy downtown
> gentrification from the late 1980's through the present. In partial
> response to the human costs of displacement, the City created an ordinance
> (Seattle Municipal Code 22.210.130) whereby, "Low-income tenants who are
> displaced by demolition, change of use, substantial rehabilitation, or
> removal of use restrictions, ....be paid by the City...relocation assistance
> [that] shall be adjusted annually by the percentage amount of change in the
> housing component of the Consumer Price Index..."
>
> I don't know hou the funding mechanism is sourced.
>
> The MRA has an obligation to assure relocation assistance to tenants who are
> displaced because of projects directly receiving MRA funds. Unfortunately,
> I'm afraid that at times, regulatory loopholes related to project timing
> (when MRA actually becomes officially involved), could allow devlopers the
> opportunity to evade that intent. I know that Ellen Buchanan and the MRA
> board are looking at housing policies that will go beyond that requirement
> and that will make proactive strategies to guarantee that some component of
> affordable housing be created in MRA's renewal districts. I'm very much
> looking forward to see what comes from these current discussions.
>
> Whatever we can come up with as a community, it will be none too soon. It
> sounds like the Penwell might go the way of the Wilma and, now, the Babs.
> It's great seeing the rewards of this type of reinvestment but the social
> costs in displacing residents (and sometimes businesses) is not discussed
> nearly enough. Thanks to everyone who has responded, so far, to add to that
> conversation.
>
> Bob Oaks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Note: This list is NOT an official service of the City Of Missoula. But posts to this list may be entered into the public record.
> Subscribe or view archives at Missoulagov.org
> List Serve hosting provided by www.CedarMountainSoftware.com.
_________________________________________________________________
Get ideas on sharing photos from people like you. Find new ways to share.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/photogallery/posts?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Photo_Gallery_082008
More information about the MissoulaGov
mailing list