[Dec-advocacy] news update
Sarah Hadden
dsh5gn at virginia.edu
Mon Mar 13 14:01:35 UTC 2006
Welcome to the DEC Advocacy List. The Division for Early Childhood
(DEC) of the Council for Exceptional Children is a non-profit
membership organization advocating for individuals who work with or on
behalf of children with special needs, birth through age eight, and
their families. For more information about DEC, please contact the DEC
Office at: The Division for Early Childhood, 27 Fort Missoula Road,
Suite 2, Missoula, MT 59804. Phone: 406-543-0872, Fax: 406-543-0887,
e-mail: dec at dec-sped.org. If you would like to either join or be
removed from the DEC Advocacy List, email Sarah Hadden at
dsh5gn at virginia.edu. Additional information about governmental
relations activities can be obtained by visiting the DEC website:
http://www.dec-sped.org/
3/13/06
Good morning. I am forwarding, in its entirety, CEC's most recent
policy update. The update provides information about the FY 2007
budget resolution that has been passed by the Senate's Budget
Committee.
Sarah Hadden
DEC Governmental Relations Committee
From CEC's Policy and Communication Services Unit 3/10/06
Senate Budget Resolution Provides Empty Promises For Education, IDEA
On Thursday of this week, the Senate Budget Committee passed a budget
resolution for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 that claims to provide increased
funding for education and IDEA, but in the end it only continues the
trend of under-funding this nation's education programs. The House will
consider its budget resolution in the coming weeks.
In February of each year, after the President has sent his formal
budget request to Congress for the ensuing fiscal year, each house of
Congress passes a budget resolution detailing how Congress will spend
money on a wide variety of programs. These programs are categorized
under functions, and appropriations bills, bills that specify how money
is spent on federal programs, can include several functions under their
authority. For example, Function 500 is Education, Training,
Employment, and Social Services, and Function 550 is Health. Both of
these functions fall under the Health, Education, Labor, and
Independent Agencies appropriations bill.
When the House and Senate Budget Committees recommend funding amounts
for these functions, the members of the appropriations committees
adhere to these spending levels. If, for example, Function 500 receives
$100, then the appropriators can spend $20 on the Department of Labor,
$50 on Social Security, $15 on Training programs, and $15 for the
Department of Education. Or they can spend the $100 on those programs
any way they want, so long as they don't spend more than $100 total,
and they can't take money from another function, like defense, to give
more money to education. For this reason, CEC has asked its members in
recent weeks to contact their members of Congress asking them to
provide increased funding in the House and Senate budget resolutions
for IDEA and Javits grants for students with gifts and talents.
The FY 2007 Senate budget resolution claims to have increased funding
for education, but the overall funding for FY 2007 in the resolution is
below the FY 2006 level, and the total money for discretionary spending
is the same as President Bush's FY 2007 budget request. The Senate
budget resolution as passed by the committee seeks to provide 20
percent of the full funding level for IDEA for FY 2008 through FY 2011,
but this is achieved by providing $2 billion extra for IDEA in each of
those years, and assumes that the additional $1.5 billion for education
for FY 2007 in the resolution all goes toward IDEA. For FY 2007, the
next fiscal year, the Senate budget resolution only adheres to the
President's recommendation of an additional $100 million for IDEA.
CEC is appalled that the Senate Budget Committee is again ignoring
Congress' 31-year-old promise to fully fund IDEA. Even the proposed
funding total for IDEA in FY 2008 falls well short of what Congress is
authorized to spend on IDEA under the IDEA 2004 reauthorization. The
full Senate is poised to debate this budget resolution early next week,
and it is our understanding that amendments will be offered to provide
more funds for Function 500. When we learn what the details of those
amendments are, we will make letters available to you on our
Legislative Action Center so that you can tell your Senators that
enough is enough and now is the time to fully fund IDEA!
Secretary Spellings Testifies on 2007 Education Budget; Defends $3.5
Billion in Cuts
On March 9, Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, testified before
the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Labor, Health and Human
Services, and Education defending President Bush’s fiscal year (FY)
2007 education budget proposal, which seeks to cut funding by $3.5
billion.
Throughout her testimony, Secretary Spellings stressed that the Bush
Administration’s budget recommendations to Congress emphasized
competitiveness in the global economy. To that end, Secretary Spellings
discussed specific requests in this budget recommendation, including:
- $100 million for IDEA Part B – State grant program
- $1.5 billion for High School Reform – The stated goal of this program
is to ensure that every student graduates from high school with the
skills need to succeed. This reform would also expand current NCLB
assessments beyond the one grade in which they are currently
administered.
- $100 million Striving Readers program – This program would expand
research-based methods for those reading below grade level, using the
Reading First model.
- $250million for Math Now – A program focused on implementing
instructional practices for students kindergarten through middle
school.
- $90 million for Advanced Placement program
- $12.7 billion for Title I Grants to LEAs
- $200 million School Improvement Grants program – under NCLB
- $100 million America’s Opportunity Scholarships for Kids – funding
that would be given to parents of student who attended low performing
schools who would have the option of placing their child in a private
school setting.
During the question-and-answer portion of her time before the
subcommittee, members of the subcommittee from both parties grilled Ms.
Spellings over the Administration's policies on numerous issues,
including:
- Congressman Obey's (D-WI) objection to the overall decline in
education funding;
- Congressman Simpson's (R-ID) agreement with Congressman Obey's
critique;
- Congressman Kennedy's (D-MA) concerns about IDEA, Pell, and Even
Start funding;
- Congresswoman Granger's (R-TX) concerns about the Department's
programs on childhood obesity and physical education;
- Congresswoman Roybal-Allard's (D-CA) concerns about Pell grants,
TRIO, GEAR Up, Perkins loans, and the Safe and Drug Free Schools
program;
- Congressman Peterson's (R-PA) concerns about lack of technology
funding;
- Congresswoman Lowey's (D-NY) concerns about Perkins loans for higher
education;
-Congresswoman Northup's (R-KY) concerns about Head Start and after
school programs;
- Congressman Hoyer (D-MD), who stated, "The President's budget is
sounding the retreat on meeting the goals of NCLB and expanded
opportunities for higher education previously announced by the
President".;
- Congresswoman DeLauro's (D-CT) concern about federal student aid; and
- Congressman Regula (R-OH), who voiced his concerns about dropout
prevention, teacher/principal quality, and reading, which he feels was
not adequately funded. He also added that he strongly agrees with need
to increase education funding to meet challenge of global competition.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 7988 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.cmslists.com/pipermail/dec-advocacy/attachments/20060313/02723bb2/attachment.bin
More information about the Dec-advocacy
mailing list